Dangerous Condition of Public Property

Overview
A dangerous condition of public property case is similar to a premises liability case. Although they are similar, they are not the same. For related information go to Premises Liability.

To establish the claim of a dangerous condition of public property, the plaintiff must prove:

That the defendant owned or controlled the property;
That the property was in a dangerous condition at the time of the incident;
That the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of incident that occurred;
 That negligent conduct of the defendant's employee acting within the scope of his or her employment created the dangerous condition or defendant had notice of the dangerous condition for a long enough time to have protected against it;
That the plaintiff was harmed; and
 That the dangerous condition was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's  harm.
CACI 1100

(CACI are the approved jury instructions from the Judicial Council of California. Jury instructions are read to the jury by the judge and establish the law the jury must follow in deciding the case. A partner of Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett has been formally recognized as one of the attorneys who assisted the task force in the preparation of these jury instructions.)

The jury is instructed that "a ?dangerous condition? is a condition of public property that creates a substantial risk of injury to members of the general public who are using the property with reasonable care and in a reasonably foreseeable manner. A condition that creates only a minor risk of injury is not a dangerous condition."
CACI 1102

  Unsafe conditions in government-owned or operated buildings
  Inoperable signal lights
  Absent or broken street lights
  Inadequate or absent guard rails
  Dangerously designed crosswalks
  Inadequate traffic warning signs such as
       "curve ahead," "slow," "merging traffic," or "slippery when wet."

Typical Defenses:
  Plaintiff was negligent
  The risk of harm was minor
  Defendant did not create the dangerous condition
  Design immunity
  Impractical and too costly to take alternative action
  Defendant did not have sufficient time to discover, warn against, or correct the                           Click to enlarge
     dangerous situation

Conclusion

There are many pitfalls an inexperienced attorney may be unaware of when handling a case against a public entity. The attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett have written and lectured on the subject of dangerous condition of public property.

Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett has the extensive resources to handle the most complex legal matters, yet is small enough to offer individualized service to our clients.

At Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett we believe the more you know, the better choice you will make.

<back to top>

 

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.