|
Negligence
Law
For the last thirty years, Cheong,
Denove, Rowell & Bennett has successfully represented clients who have
been injured because of someone's negligence. To be successful requires
dedication, hard work, courage and experience. In handling negligence
cases, the attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett have dedicated
themselves to provide the quality of representation the members of the
firm would want for themselves if they or a family member were seriously
injured.
The attorneys understand that few things
worth having can be achieved without hard work. They know it takes
courage to stand up to insurance companies and manufacturers who are
willing to spend unlimited sums of money to try to beat the clients into
submission. The attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett have
learned that effort and desire can only go so far if they are not backed
up by experience. At Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett, we believe the
more you know, the better choice you will make. The following is a short
summary explaining the law of negligence.
Overview
California Law states that "Everyone is
responsible . . . for an injury occasioned by another for his or her
want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property
or person . ." Civil Code ? 1714 (a). Simply put, one is responsible for
any injury or damage caused by his negligent conduct. Negligence law
comes into play in many types of cases, including motor vehicle
accidents, slip or trip and falls, construction accidents, and almost
any situation one can imagine where someone has been injured or harmed
because another person acted carelessly. The following is a short
explanation of the law of negligence.
Negligence
Negligence is defined as
the failure to use reasonable care to prevent harm. A person can be
negligent by actions or failures to act. In determining if someone is
negligent the jury is instructed that "a person is negligent if he or
she does something that a reasonably careful person would not do in the
same situation or fails to do something that a reasonably careful person
would do in the same situation." CACI 401
(CACI are the
approved jury instructions from the Judicial Council of California. Jury
instructions are read to the jury by the judge and establish the law the
jury must follow in deciding the case. A partner of Cheong, Denove,
Rowell & Bennett has been formally recognized as one of the attorneys
who assisted the task force in the preparation of these jury
instructions.)
In some situations
involving
Products Liability,
Common Carriers, and
Dog
Attacks, the law imposes a higher degree of care than reasonable
care.
|
Causation
Proving
negligence is the first step to recovery. The
injured party must also prove that the
negligence was a cause of injury or damage. To
prove that negligence was a cause, the law
requires proof that the negligent act was a
substantial factor in causing the harm. "A
substantial factor in causing harm is a factor
that a reasonable person would consider to have
contributed to the harm. It must be more than a
remote or trivial factor. It does not have to be
the only cause of the harm." CACI 430 |
|

Click to Enlarge |
Damages
Once the jury has been
persuaded that the defendant was negligent and that the negligence was a
substantial factor in causing the harm, the jury then decides how much
money will compensate the plaintiff for the harm. The harm consists of
both economic and non-economic damages.
Economic damages include past and future
medical expenses, lost earnings, lost earning capacity, loss of one's
ability to provide household services, lost profits, damages to property
and loss of use of property. CACI 3903A-N
Non-economic damages include past and
future physical pain, mental suffering, loss of enjoyment or life,
disfigurement, physical impairment, inconvenience, grief, anxiety,
humiliation and emotional distress. CACI 3905A
In certain situations one can recover
damages even if the negligence did not cause a direct injury to the one
who is making the claim. One example is when a husband, wife or child
has been killed, the surviving spouse, children and parents can recover
loss of consortium. These damages include loss of financial support,
loss of gifts as benefits, funeral and burial expense, value of
household services that would have been provided and the loss of love,
companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection,
society, moral support, training, guidance and the loss of enjoyment of
sexual relations. CACI 3921, 3922
When a spouse has been seriously injured
but not killed, the non-injured spouse can also seek compensation for
similar damages. CACI 3920 This is referred to as loss of
consortium and it is considered to be non-economic damage.
In cases where the defendant has
committed fraud or has acted oppressively or maliciously, the plaintiff
may seek punitive or exemplary damages. These damages are designed to
punish the wrongdoer for the conduct and to discourage similar conduct
in the future. CACI 3947
Conclusion
Unfortunately, just
because one is legally entitled to recover damages does not always
result in a favorable outcome. It is the job of the attorney to present
the case in a way to maximize the opportunity for a successful result.
For related information about specific injuries go to
Injury Definitions.
The attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell &
Bennett have authored numerous articles and have lectured extensively on
the subject of negligence law, damages and trial practice.
Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett
has the extensive resources to handle the most
complex legal matters, yet is small enough to offer individualized
service to our clients.
 |
At
Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett we believe the more you know,
the better choice you will make. |
<back to top>
The information you
obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. This
web site is designed for general information only. The information
presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice
nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
|